USTA Juniors, Why So Few Tournaments?
Last Weekend 39 L6 12u Boys Tournaments Were Available Nationally - About 1000 Spots For an Entire Country of 10-12 Y/O Boys.
I picked L6 to look at because these are beginner tournaments and most kids will end their competitive tennis interest at this level. The L7s are entry levels. Kids who never played tournaments start at L7s and only stay there until they have enough points to get into an L6 one. Because L7s are bottom up draws, successful kids are pushed to L6 after a few L7s. Every kid that gets good at tennis has to play L6 and a quick look at rankings show that most kids’ competitive tennis experience ends at L6. L6 tournaments are the tennis version of the super popular travel soccer and basketball leagues.
Last weekend there were 39 boys 12u L6 tournaments nationally. Even if they all had a 32 draw, that’s only 1248 spots. But some are only 16. So for an entire nation of 10, 11, and 12 year old boys eager to test their new tennis skills, we offered about 1000 spots.
Why some of the most populous USTA sections in the country have zero L6s on a weekend seems totally wacko. I guarantee there were plenty of other organized youth sports on offer. Sometimes it seems like tennis really doesn’t want to be that popular
Here’s the breakdown by section alphabetically listed.
Caribbean: 0 Boys 12u L6 Tournaments
Eastern: 3 Tournaments
Hawaii Pac: 0 Tournaments
Intermountain: 0 Tournaments
Florida: 6 Tournaments
Mid-Atlantic: 0 Tournaments
Middle-States: 0 Tournaments
Midwest: 7 Tournaments
Missouri Valley: 2 Tournaments
New England: 1 Tournaments
Northern: 2 Tournaments
Northern Cali: 2 Tournaments
Pac NW: 0 Tournaments
Southern: 9 Tournaments
Southern Cali: 1 Tournaments
Southwest: 0 Tournaments
Texas: 5 Tournaments
Because there are so few L6s offered and only about 10 L5s each weekend, L6s are the wild west when it comes to player levels.
Top seeds range from kids with serious national rankings to those with solid wins but not yet enough points to reliably get into an L5.
I took a look at the 3 most recent L6 12u boys draws for tournaments across USTA sections. The list is ordered by how many players are in the section. See my earlier post for info about tournament participation.
Any tournament with a top seed over 400 points is bolded because that’s a sign that the section is forcing their best kids and their newer kids into the same level. If it happens 1 out of 3 tournaments then maybe that’s just kids making kid choices. But 2/3 or 3/3 shows the section is not organizing enough tournaments.
Southern:
Southern does some great stuff in the draws to give the lowest rank kids a chance without taking away the seeded players first round advantage.
Top seed has 349 points, lowest rank kid has 22 points
Top seed 436, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 229, lowest rank 0 points
Texas:
Top seed 401, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 471, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 545, lowest rank 20 points
Midwest:
Top seed 1611, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 350, lowest rank 42 points
Top seed 184, lowest rank 64 points
Florida:
Top seed 156, lowest rank 116 points
Top seed 290, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 488, lowest rank 12 points
Southern California:
Top seed 477, lowest rank 20 points
Top seed 351, lowest rank 76 points
Top seed 477, lowest rank 22 points Same kid is top seed in #1 and #3.
Eastern:
Top seed 449, lowest rank 72 points
Top seed 1012, lowest rank 58 points
Top seed 383, lowest rank 76 points So close to a 400 point first seed here.
Northern California:
Top seed 694, lowest rank 222 points
Top seed 568, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 563, lowest rank 0 points
Mid-Atlantic:
Top seed 189, lowest rank 60 points
Top seed 391, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 436, lowest rank 140 points
Missouri Valley:
Top seed 245, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 309, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 664, lowest rank 26 points
Intermountain:
Top seed 808, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 555, lowest rank 54 points
Top seed 292, lowest rank 175 points
Middle States:
Had to go back to Jan 1 to find 3 tournaments. Why so few tournaments in such a populous area? Scarcity makes it pretty impossible for new players. Once kids have too many points to reliably get into an L7s they will not have enough to reliably get into an L6.
Top seed 752 , lowest rank 30 points
Top seed 713, lowest rank 135 points
Top seed 674, lowest rank 210 points
New England:
Top seed 406, lowest rank 66 points
Top seed 458, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 461, lowest rank 0 points
Pacific Northwest:
Top seed 506, lowest rank 12 points
Top seed 479, lowest rank 42 points
Top seed 479, lowest rank 0 points Same kid is top seed in #1 and #3.
Southwest:
Top seed 334, lowest rank 95 points
Top seed 458, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 989, lowest rank 32 points
Northern:
Top seed 138, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 283, lowest 0 rank points
Top seed 133, lowest 0 rank points
Hawaii Pacific:
Top seed 1016, lowest rank 0 points
Top seed 1768, lowest rank 54 points
Top seed 909, lowest rank 20 points
Caribbean: No L6s yet this year.
Thanks for reading!
I read every single one of your posts and I largely agree, especially this one. In US Eastern for instance, you actually see kids with UTR >5 playing L6, because there aren't enough L5 and up tournaments. This squeezes up and coming L6 players, because they either can't get in L6 while being overqualified for L7, or they just lose in R1. As you think about it, it takes a kid probably 5 years of play to reach 5 UTR (Say you start at 7 yo and you get there at 12 - I know, hardly a prodigy)? Then you have little chance to go deep until you are 4 years in. This is not a very rewarding process.
As you said, there should simply be more L7 and L6 tournaments. But it's partly an economic problem. If you are a for-profit club, why should you give up 4 pickle ball courts with max. 16 people for one hour of tournament play for 2 kids at maybe ~$40 revenue for that hour?
Does the USTA have funding to support it? How about rich guys with last names like Ellison and Pegula? Maybe there needs to be a funding drive!